11 Jun 2025
What to Know About Donald Trump’s China-US Trade Agreement

President Donald Trump's announcement of a finalized U.S.-China trade agreement, contingent upon final approval from himself and President Xi Jinping, marks a significant, albeit potentially volatile, development in the complex relationship between the two economic superpowers. His claim of an "excellent" relationship with President Xi should be viewed with caution, given the historical tensions and ongoing geopolitical complexities. The agreement, as described by Trump, involves several key concessions and stipulations.
Trump's assertion of securing access to Chinese rare earth minerals and magnets is particularly noteworthy. These minerals are crucial for numerous high-tech applications, from smartphones and electric vehicles to military hardware, making control over their supply chain a significant strategic advantage.
The details of this access, however, remain unclear. Will it involve direct access to mines, preferential pricing, or merely increased quotas? Further clarification is necessary to assess the true impact of this provision. The allowance for Chinese students to attend U.S. universities, while seemingly beneficial for both sides, could also raise concerns regarding intellectual property protection and potential espionage.
The proposed tariff structure—55% on Chinese goods and 10% on U.S. goods—represents a substantial imbalance. While Trump frames this as a "win," economists would likely point to the potential for increased prices for American consumers and retaliatory measures from China. This asymmetrical tariff structure contrasts sharply with the aims of promoting balanced trade relationships. The fact that the 55% figure is significantly higher than previous stated positions adds to the overall level of uncertainty regarding the specifics of the deal.
The agreement builds upon a framework established in Geneva, which aimed to de-escalate retaliatory tariffs that had spiraled to crippling levels. This earlier Geneva deal encountered setbacks due to China's restrictions on critical mineral exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with its own export controls on technology and other goods.
This tit-for-tat approach highlights the precarious nature of US-China trade relations, and the inherent risks in relying on such a volatile policy approach. The lack of transparency surrounding the "final approval" process also raises questions about the enforceability and long-term stability of the agreement.
The economic impact of this agreement remains uncertain. Trump's volatile tariff policies have consistently roiled global markets, causing significant uncertainty for businesses and investors. The proposed tariff structure, along with the potential for future policy shifts, could continue to create instability.
Independent economic analysis will be crucial to assess the true effects of this deal on both the U.S. and Chinese economies, considering factors beyond the stated tariff rates, including the impact on supply chains, consumer prices, and the broader geopolitical landscape. The agreement's long-term success hinges on transparent implementation, verifiable compliance, and a commitment to stable and predictable trade policies from both sides, something that has been historically lacking in the Trump-era relationship with China.